Re: [multitail] turbotail?

["Jim Herrick" <jim@bleedpurple.com>]

I'm being nitpicky and I doubt it's related, but here is a recent entry from
my maillog, anyway:

--- BEGIN

Aug 25 14:29:52 flanders sm-msp-queue[683]: starting daemon (8.12.11):
queueing@00:15:00
Aug 25 14:29:52 flanders sendm
ail[688]: starting daemon (8.12.11): queueing@00:15:00
Aug 25 14:29:57 flanders MailScanner[742]: MailScanner E-Mail Virus Scanner
version 4.32.5 starting...

--- END

When the window was drawing as the program (multitail) started, these last
couple of lines were being added to the log.  There's a split between the
middle line (between "sendm" and "ail").  Probably just a hiccup, I guess.

Jim

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Herrick" <jim@bleedpurple.com>
To: <multitail@vanheusden.com>
Sent: Monday, 23 August, 2004 14:53
Subject: Re: [multitail] turbotail?


> About 4 days of continuous use (replacing tail and using multitail) - with
> no problems.  Keep up the good work!
>
> Jim
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Folkert van Heusden" <folkert@vanheusden.com>
> To: <multitail@vanheusden.com>
> Sent: Monday, 23 August, 2004 14:38
> Subject: [multitail] turbotail?
>
>
> > Has anyone tried turbotail v0.2?
> > (http://www.vanheusden.com/Linux/turbotail-0.2.tgz) The 100% cpu usage
bug
> > should've been fixed.
> >
> >
> > Folkert.
> >
> > +------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > |UNIX admin? Then give MultiTail (http://vanheusden.com/multitail/)|
> > |a try, it brings monitoring logfiles to a different level! See    |
> > |http://vanheusden.com/multitail/features.html for a feature list. |
> > +------------------------------------------= www.unixsoftware.nl =-+
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> > This message was sent through the MultiTail mailinglist
> (www.vanheusden.com/multitail)
> >
>